headerani1.gif (238202 bytes)

 
Experience this wonderful natural beauty while it still exists
—  it may not be in `safe hands` for long.

HOME SANDSPIT - THE WRONG PLACE FOR A MARINA COMMENTS & REPLIES LATEST NEWS CONTACT US JOIN

Updated: September 19th 2011

The battle continues ! 
As from Tuesday May 10th 2011 the  Committee of the Sandspit Residents and Ratepayers Association, (a completely separate body from our own organisation) is now almost 100% controlled by members who are also members of the Sandspit Yacht Club Marina Society or are supportive of a marina.

At the Annual General Meeting of the Association some members of the old committee were replaced by persons friendly to the marina developers, to form a new committee with the existing pro-marina group.  The new Chairman is also a member of the Marina Society.

The following emails have been received for and against in response to this summary of the AGM of the Sandspit Resident & Ratepayers Assoc (SRRA) May 2011 We have not disclosed the senders due to privacy.

If you wish to add a comment or reply to anything concerning our community .... just email us and we will post it anonymously for reply by all in sundry. Some correspondents choose to use an alias.

Date:

QUESTION ANSWER
02.08.11 Could someone please tell me what bird and fish life exists at Sandspit ? Extensive surveys have been carried out over the past few years and you may be very surprised to learn that Godwits, Banded Rail, and many endangered bird species find Sandspit an abundant feeding ground. Endangered fish species such as short & long fin eels etc can be found in the Brick Bay Stream which empties into the Sandspit Estuary by the Yacht Club.
01.08.11 Hi there ... When will a Marina be developed in Sandspit ? Sandfly responds ... What Marina ?
31.07.11 "Which exact questions were considered biased in the 2010 community survey? The 2004 survey seems to include all the same questions except one on the marina proposal." Awaiting answer to this question.
31.07.11 Why did the 2011 SRRA committee withdraw the 2010 community survey from their website?" 2011 SRRA Chair replies: " ...because we felt that the questions within were biased and upset numbers of residents who did not bother filling in the questionnaire."
31.07.11 Are paid up members of of the Ratepayers' Association allowed to attend Committee meetings to listen to what is being discussed ? Apparently not, according to the Chairman of the SRRA. He advises us that the Association has consulted Legal Advice and the advice is, that because the Committee has been "elected democratically" to represent members, they then have the power to hold committee meetings in private.
31.07.11 Sorry ... I thought Democracy was based on openess. Am I wrong to think that a small 200 member community organisation is now controlled by people wanting to "hide something" ? Obviously, being a committee almost 100% pro marina, they do not want the "boat rocked" so to speak.
15.07.11 Hi there .... As a member of the Sandspit Residents and Ratepayers Association, how come there is absolutley no mention of the marina development in their latrest newsletter The Sizzler Responds ....Yes, the answer is clear. The Ratepayers Assoc has been taken over by pro marina people who don't want to face up to the fact that the marina development is indeed, the very issue that is set to destroy our beautiful harbour and estuary. So they disguise the issue by focusing on all the other issues that affect our community that the past Committee had established and put in place. Note also, that there is no mention of the restoration project for Dean's Island ... in fact, I think they simply want to abandon all the good work put in by the outgoing committee, because it stands in the way of the marina development...
05.05.11 "I suggest you get your facts straight, as I think you will find that there are a quite a few new committee members that in fact ARE NOT marina society members.  Instead of a one sided biased committee those who put themselves forward were simply seeking some balance!!   The previous committee obviously had their own agenda, which was not representing the views of the ENTIRE community!" Sandfly responds ...Indeed!  Let's get some facts straight.
There was a request from your emailer for balance and he/she believes that the make-up of the  2011 committee has achieved balance.

The SRRA was set up originally to oppose a marina on the east side of the spit. The current SRRA committee will do its best to turn your beloved Sandspit into a car and boat park.

Here's a dictionary meaning of balance: balance;" the difference in magnitude between opposing forces or influences."

01.05.11 Hi there ...why do you anti marina people keep calling us developers ? If you live in Sandspit, surely you should be happy that property values will increase as a result of this boat marina. Thats progress isn't it? Sandfly responds....Sandspit is my home.It is the place I love to be, where I want to grow old, where I want to see the trees I planted flourish and the soil provide my food, where I find peace and pleasure.It is not a commodity for mere trade.

A Real Estate/ Developer looks at land as just an object for trade and profit.When land values go up, rates go up too.Only the wealthy prosper further in this mad merry-go-round.

Real Estate developers and marina developers are in a rat race believing that those who die with the most toys, win the race.But, the problem with the rat race, is that at the end you are still a rat.
01.05.11 The Sizzler responds ..... "First up .... you have to define progress. As a resident of Sandspit, I don't want progress if it means our magnificent natural environment is destroyed for the sake of a few large gas guzzling boats.
Secondly, anyone who develops and destroys a naturally beautiful harbour and coastline by dredging out 100,000 cubic metres of mud for a man made boat marina, and in the process, takes over all available public reserve for car and trailer parking, is a developer of the worst kind.... and that certainly ain't progress."

Sandfly responds:.... Here is the 2011 make-up of committee members and the opinion of each on this one question of a marina at Sandspit.
To ascertain allegiances I referred to the RDC  Hearings Document which shows the position of each submitter.
I also referred to the SYC membership list along with a presumably correct list of SYCMS members.

New Chair of SRRA. Submitter pro-marina. SYCMS member seeking a berth.
New Secretary. Submitter pro-marina. SYC member.
Treasurer. SYCMS member, berth seeker.

Committee Member: SYC member. Neutral on marina.
Committee Member: Submitter pro-marina.
Committee Member: Submitter pro-marina. SYCMS member. (Real Estate Sales)
Committee Member: Submitter pro-marina, SYC member.
Committee Memberl: Submitter pro-marina, SYCMS member.
Committee Member: Submitter pro-marina. SYC member. (Property Developer)
Committee Member: Submitter pro-marina. SYC member. (Wife of Above Property Developer)
Committee Member: SYC member, submitter pro-marina but has changed her mind and withdrawn from SYCMS.
Committee Member: Submitter pro-marina. SYC member.
Committee Member: Submitter pro-marina SYC member.(Parents-in-law SYCMS)

Now ,let's look at the percentages for the 
2011 committee compared with 2010 committee and the survey on proposed marina question

Balance ....Yeah right !

. . .

 

2011 committee

2010 committee

2010 Community survey

Pro-marina

11 members

84.6%

4 members

30.76%

23%

Anti-marina

0 members

0 %

6 members

46.15%

49%

Neutral on marina

1 member

7.69%

2 members

15.38%

28%

Undecided

1 member

7.69%

1 member

7.69%